Internal Audit Results
The Bachelor of Medicine Study Program is audited through an internal audit mechanism by the Quality Assurance Unit (UJM) as an internal evaluation work unit for the implementation of the study program work program and Internal Quality Audit (AIM) cycle 16 of 2017. The internal auditor from UJM is the UJM study program team while the auditor is from the team PJM as the implementer of AIM cycle 16, namely Prof. Dr. dr. Loeki Enggar Fitri, MKes, SpParK (Chairman) and dr. Siwipeni Irmawanti Rahayu, M. Biomed (Member). The evaluation by the Internal Auditor Team was carried out on November 21 in the meeting room of the GPP building, 2nd floor, room 2.15. The Quality Internal Auditor Team carried out a follow-up evaluation of the previous year's findings and evaluated the fulfillment of UB's Quality Standards, as well as evaluating the fulfillment of Website Standards. Results of evaluation by internal auditors regarding old findings and follow-up actions that have been carried out
Eksternal Audit Results
The Bachelor Medical Study Program has also recently undergone an external audit from AUNQA. These activities have been carried out
Date: 9-11 Januari 2018
Place: GPP Auditorium and Senate Room, 6th floor
Assessor Name: 1. Assoc. Prof. Chavalit Wongse-ek (AUN-QA Expert, Thailand)
2. Prof. Dr. Aleth Therese L. Dacanay, University of Santo Tomas, Philippines
Audit scope: 1. Expected Learning Outcomes
2. Programme Specification
3. Programme Structure and Content
4. Teaching and Learning Approach
5. Student Assessment
6. Academic Staff Quality
7. Support Staff Quality
8. Student Quality and Support
9. Facilities and Infrastructure
10. Quality Enhancement
11. Output
The image above is a quality assurance design that can be suggested. Based on an external audit from the CENMEDIC institution in 2014, the study program received several recommendations regarding efforts to improve quality. Even though the study program has carried out several evaluations through questionnaires distributed to stakeholders, there is no indication that the process is well organized and the use of the survey results in efforts to improve quality assurance is not yet evident. CENMEDIC stated that the quality assurance process in study programs requires urgent attentionIt is recommended that the quality assurance process should be managed by one group while the Quality Assurance Task can be carried out by other people as needed.